Lower your car theft and safety risk
Overview
Published: February 2018
There is a lot to consider when buying a vehicle. The price, fuel efficiency, seating, aesthetics, functionality, storage and towing capacity may all be important to your needs.
Two very important features to consider are:
- Safety in terms of both avoiding and when involved in a crash
- The car's risk of theft
We've made that easy by putting our CARS theft risk rating together with the ANCAP car safety ratings and the used car safety rating published by Monash University and the VSRG.
The ratings by vehicle segment on this page show cars that have received 4 star or more for the CARS theft risk rating. In simple terms, the more stars the better for all of the ratings.
For a complete list of the 2016 CARS theft risk rating with their corresponding ANCAP safety rating and the Used Car Safety Rating, click here to download the list.
Further information about the individual rating systems can be found in the tabs above.
Ratings by vehicle segment
Make model series year range | NMVTRC CARS theft risk rating |
ANCAP safety rating program |
VSRG Used car safety rating |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Ford Transit VN MY14+ | ||||
Ford Transit VO MY14+ | ||||
Citroen Berlingo B9C MY09+ | ||||
Mahindra Pik-Up S5 MY07+ | ||||
Renault Trafic L1 MY04_15 | ||||
Toyota Landcruiser 70 Series MY90_99 | ||||
Isuzu D-Max TF MY02+ | ||||
Mazda BT-50 MY11+ | ||||
Nissan Navara NP300 D23 MY15+ | ||||
LDV V80 MY12+ | ||||
Ford Transit VJ MY04_06 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Sprinter MY06+ | ||||
Ford Transit VG MY97_00 | ||||
Renault Kangoo X76 MY03_10 | ||||
Suzuki Sierra Pre_MY01 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz Vito MY03_15 | ||||
Ford Falcon Ute FGX MY14_16 | ||||
Mitsubishi Triton MQ MY15+ | ||||
Toyota Hilux MY15+ | ||||
Volkswagen Amarok 2H MY10+ | ||||
Ford Ranger PX MY11+ | ||||
Holden Colorado RG MY12+ | ||||
Hyundai iLoad TQ MY07+ | ||||
Mitsubishi Triton MN MY09_15 | ||||
Volkswagen Transporter T5 MY04_16 | ||||
Volkswagen Caddy 2K MY04+ | ||||
Holden Colorado RC MY08_12 | ||||
Mazda BT-50 MY06_11 | ||||
Ford Transit VM MY06_14 | ||||
Foton Tunland P201 MY12+ | ||||
Ssangyong Actyon Q100 MY06+ | ||||
Suzuki APV GD MY04+ | ||||
Proton Jumbuck MY02_11 | ||||
Ford Ranger PK MY09_11 | ||||
Volkswagen Transporter T4 MY90_04 | ||||
Citroen Berlingo MY00_03 | ||||
Ford F250 MY04_08 | ||||
Land Rover Defender MY00+ | ||||
Mazda B4000 MY05_07 | ||||
Nissan Patrol GQ MY88_97 | ||||
Renault Master X70 MY03_13 |
Make model series year range | NMVTRC CARS theft risk rating |
ANCAP safety rating program |
VSRG Used car safety rating |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
MG MGF MY95_05 | ||||
Porsche 911 991 MY12+ | ||||
Mazda MX-5 ND MY15+ | ||||
Mercedes-Benz CLA45 C117 MY13+ | ||||
Holden Monaro VZ MY04_06 | ||||
Volkswagen EOS 1F MY06_14 | ||||
BMW Z3 E36 MY95_02 | ||||
Mazda MX-5 NC MY05_15 | ||||
Porsche Boxster 986 MY96_05 | ||||
Mazda MX-5 NB MY98_05 | ||||
BMW 428i F32 MY13_16 | ||||
FPV GT BF MY05_08 | ||||
FPV GT-P BA MY03_05 | ||||
Honda Integra MY01_06 | ||||
Mercedes-Benz A45 W176 MY13+ | ||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK280 C209 MY05_10 | ||||
Nissan 370Z Z34 MY09+ | ||||
Porsche 911 996 MY98_06 | ||||
Porsche 911 997 MY05_12 | ||||
Porsche Boxster 981 MY12_16 | ||||
Porsche Boxster 987 MY05_12 |
Used car safety rating
Driver protection rating | |
---|---|
Excellent | |
Good | |
Marginal | |
Poor | |
Very Poor | |
Only vehicles which provide excellent protection to their own driver, cause less serious injury to other drivers, pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists in a collision and are fitted with ESC achieve a Safe Pick rating. ESC helps avoid a crash and can reduce the severity of the crash if it cannot be avoided. | Safe pick |
The Used Car Safety Ratings are published by the Vehicle Safety Reference Group (VSRG) and show how well each vehicle protects its driver from death or serious injury in a crash. It is also important that a vehicle offers good protection to other road users, including pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists, or drivers of other vehicles. Vehicles that provide excellent protection from injury for their driver as well as other road users in a crash receive a 'safe pick' rating.
The rating show that, on average, newer models provide their drivers with better protection from injury in a crash. These improvements come from better structural designs, an increase in the fitting of safety features such as front, side, curtain and knee airbags, more advanced seat belt systems and vehicle interiors built with more energy-absorbing materials.
Another consistent trend is that there is significant variation in the ratings within vehicle categories, even between vehicle models of the same age. Furthermore, some vehicle models, including recent ones, provide good protection for their drivers but present a high risk of injury to other road users in a crash.
The rating assists buyers to select vehicles that provide the best protection for all road users including themselves.These ratings are based on real-world crash data up until 2014, the latest available for producing these ratings.
Many new vehicle models and some very low sales volume models of all ages are not covered by the rating due to the need for sufficient real-world crash experience to accumulate before a model can be rated accurately. Buyers considering a new or late model vehicle not listed in the rating, particularly in the light and small categories where safety performance has improved dramatically in recent years, should check the ANCAP safety ratings and look for a vehicle which holds the maximum 5 star ANCAP safety rating.
How are the used car safety ratings calculated?
Records from over 7.5 million vehicles in police-reported road crashes in Australia and New Zealand between 1987 and 2014 were analysed by Monash University’s Accident Research Centre. The ratings were calculated using an internationally reviewed method and are influenced by the vehicle’s mass, the structural design of the body, and the safety features fitted to the vehicle, such as airbags and types of seat belts.
Each of the driver protection ratings in the 2016 update has been recalculated based on the most recent crash data available so they are not comparable with the ratings published in previous years. The ratings compare the safety of each vehicle model to all other used vehicles currently available.
The driver protection ratings are about the risk of death or serious injury to the driver of the vehicle in the event of a crash. The ratings are not about the risk of being involved in the crash in the first place, which is generally determined by a range of factors including, vehicle technology, driver behaviour, vehicle condition and the road environment.
Won't certain vehicles score a good rating because of the types of people who drive them or where they are driven?
These factors were taken into account as much as possible when the data were analysed. The ratings were adjusted for factors such as driver gender and age, type of road user involved, speed limit at the crash location, number of vehicles involved, crash configuration, and year and location of crash. As far as possible the ratings are about the contribution of the vehicle to injury outcomes in a crash and not who was driving the vehicle or where it crashed.
Safe Pick
As the safety of new vehicles is constantly improving, the same models can have different ratings from previous years. Models of vehicles that cause lower injuries to other road users with which they collide, including other drivers, pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists, as well as providing excellent protection for their own driver, and are fitted with Electronic Stability Control (ESC) are awarded the “Safe Pick” label. In some models, ESC was optional so, if interested in one of these, check to see if it has ESC. The score for each individual model can be compared against the ratings for all other vehicles.
What's the difference between used car and ANCAP safety ratings?
ANCAP safety ratings are assessed by a combination of data obtained from the simulation of common crash scenarios undertaken on new vehicles in a controlled laboratory setting, the features that can help the vehicles avoid a crash or better protect their occupants in a crash, and the risk the vehicles pose to pedestrians in a crash.
Used Car Safety Ratings, as listed in this brochure, are calculated using data from millions of police reports on actual crashes involving a range of drivers and all types of driving conditions. The Used Car Safety Ratings listed in this brochure are all calculated on a consistent set of criteria and all updated annually based on the most recent real world data.
They can therefore be compared across all categories. The Used Car Safety Ratings ‘Safe Pick’ further identifies vehicles that provide the best protection for both their own drivers and other road users in a crash and are fitted with ESC. Any vehicle safety rating system can only provide an indication of the relative levels of protection between vehicles you can expect in the event of a crash. Whether or not you die or are seriously injured in a crash also depends on how safely you drive your vehicle and the circumstances of each particular crash.
CARS theft risk rating
Risk rating | Theft rate | Risk category |
---|---|---|
< 1 | Low risk | |
>=1 and < 2 | Low risk | |
>=2 and < 3 | Low risk | |
>=3 and < 4 | Medium risk | |
>=4 and < 5 | Medium risk | |
>=5 and < 6 | Medium risk | |
>=6 and < 7 | High risk | |
>=7 and < 8 | High risk | |
>=8 and < 9 | High risk | |
>=9 | High risk |
There were 38,165 PLC vehicle thefts in Australia in 2016.
The theft risk star rating is based on the theft rate per 1,000 registered PLC vehicles manufactured from 1993 onwards, with each vehicle requiring at least 1,000 registrations nationally at 30 June 2016 to be included.
Vehicles with the lowest risk of theft during 2016 scored five stars and those with the highest risk received half a star. The medium risk category has a theft rate between 1 and 2 times the low risk category, while the high risk category is more than 2 times the low risk category.
It is important to note that the CARS theft risk ratings are based solely on car theft rates and do not reflect the security features of individual vehicles.
How are IAG’s car security scores different?
The IAG car security scores are published each year by Insurance Australia Group’s (IAG) Research Centre for new PLC vehicles currently on sale in Australia. IAG assign vehicles a score out of 100 based on three main criteria:
Criteria | Description | Score |
---|---|---|
Entry | Doors, ignition locks, alarms, rear seat/boot access and glazing | Up to 10 |
Immobiliser | Higher technology immobilisers attracting higher scores | Up to 50 |
Vehicle ID | Body stamping, security labelling and micro-dotting | Up to 40 |
These scores are based on various tests performed on the vehicles and its security and identification features built into the vehicle. They provide a valuable guide for drivers wishing to purchase a new car.
The CARS theft risk rating is a useful tool when purchasing a used vehicle as it is based on theft rates once vehicles 'hit the road' and take into account the number in the Australian registered vehicle fleet. It also provides separate theft rates for each State or Territory where there are sufficient registrations.
In both cases, it should be remembered that vehicles with the best security features can be stolen if the owner does not protect their keys. More key security information is available at car-security-begins-at-home.
ANCAP rating
ANCAP safety rating | |
---|---|
5 stars | |
4 stars | |
3 stars | |
2 stars | |
1 star |
ANCAP safety ratings are published using a rating system of 1 to 5 stars and are conducted on new passenger and light commercial vehicles entering the Australian and New Zealand markets with each model assessed under identical testing standards and conditions.
The ANCAP star ratings indicate the level of safety a vehicle provides for occupants and pedestrians in the event of a crash, as well as its ability — through technology — to avoid or minimise the effects of a crash. These independent safety ratings are used to compare the relative safety between vehicles of similar mass. ANCAP safety ratings are determined based on a series of internationally recognised, independent crash tests and safety assessments – involving a range of destructive physical crash tests, an assessment of on-board safety features and equipment, and performance testing of active collision avoidance technologies.
In all physical crash tests, dummies are used to measure the forces and likely injuries a driver, passenger or pedestrian may sustain during a crash. Observations are also made on the displacement of dummies during the crash, as well as the structural impact on the vehicle's occupant compartment. Vehicles must achieve minimum scores across all physical crash tests (for each ANCAP safety rating level), as well as meet minimum requirements for the inclusion of safety equipment and technologies. To achieve the maximum 5 star ANCAP safety rating, a vehicle must perform to the highest level across all crash tests and assessments.
The ANCAP safety ratings have evolved over its 25 year history. The ratings provided are based on the criteria in place at the time of testing. Users are advised to refer to the ANCAP website for more details about the specific criteria that applied at the time of testing for each individual vehicle.
The National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council (NMVTRC) acknowledges all police services, registration authorities, participating insurers, the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries, Glass's Information Services and Insurance Australia Group for the supply of the data on which this report is compiled. Theft incident data may be subject to later revision by the data providers. This work is copyright. Material may be reproduced for personal, non-commercial use or for use within your organisation with attribution to the NMVTRC. © 2020 NMVTRC. All rights reserved.